Tami ([info]tamirisns) wrote in [info]aiyatheydidnt,
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Share  Next Entry

Chinese Government Bans Taiwanese Artistes



It looks like the previously reported cancellation of KangXi Festival might not have been the fault of the organizers.

According to reports, China's PRC film censorship bureau (SARFT) quietly recently issued a verbal order to temporarily shutout Taiwanese hosts. The reason? So that New Year's Eve concerts and variety shows do not become "money-burning contests."

Jacky Wu, as well as Xiao S and Tsai Kang-yung, hosts of Martial Arts Gathering and KangXi Festival respectively, were rumored to have been affected. However, Wu has denied notification of being shutout and KangXi Festival is still expected to put on seven concerts next year, though they are still in the negotiation stage.

It seems like the Chinese government is still keeping a watchful eye on the entertainment world. Do top government officials enjoy shows like Kang Xi Lai Le?

Source: CpopAccess
Tags: china, rumor, taiwan

Loading...
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 9 comments

[info]idarklight

2009-11-28 12:27 am UTC

First of all, this is from the Epoch Times whose goal is to convince people to abandon the mainland government.

Taiwan has banned mainland artists for years, with major restrictions on concerts, variety show appearances, and starring in Taiwanese-sponsored dramas. Interestingly, those restrictions apply only on artists from mainland, not HK, or Korea, or Japan, or Madagascar. For example, until last December, dramas could only have two mainland artists (but as many K/J/random people as possible). Now they can have five. This post on cfensi here mentions the only recent relaxations on those restrictions:
http://cfensi.wordpress.com/2008/12/30/taiwan-lifts-many-of-its-restrictions-on-mainland-artists


Meanwhile, Taiwanese (and everywhere else) artists have received almost no restrictions in mainland. Hence why so many artists from Greater China go to mainland to earn money, with many of them almost semi-based in mainland. Even when they could not survive in the very limited TW-industry, they can earn enough money given the large population and spending power of mainland.

I think this rumor is just that - a rumor like the "freezing" of Huang Xiaoming by Huayi or "banning" of ancient dramas (really?).

While I can see something like this being important if it were singers or actors, there's no revalance in terms of hosts. Mainland hosts receive as much accolade and fandom as Taiwanese ones, and rightly so, and there are very few prominent Taiwanese hosts on mainland shows. Ou-di on Hunan TV's Tian Tian Xiang Shang is really the only one who's necessary. SARFT would not concern itself with something frivolous like this.

[info]kycoo

2009-11-28 12:37 am UTC

Haha, did you leave that comment on the source article? The sentence "I would hope that the top officials have better things to do than watching Kang Xi Lai Le..." made me laugh so hard. xD

[info]idarklight

2009-11-28 12:50 am UTC

Yes, I did, and I sincerely hope they do have better things to do than watching Kang Xi Lai Le, even for entertainment. It's not exactly the most cultured show, and won't help them in figuring out the shape of Chinese entertainment. They need to be watching where the real change is happening - Hunan TV. And then Dragon TV and Jiangsu/Zhejing/Anhui TV.

They might even find the Super Girls to be good enough to go the Spring Festival Gala! (as opposed to Eva Huang or Han Xue or the TW/HK/SG/K stars they spend millions to ship in)

[info]allthingsgood

2009-11-28 03:20 am UTC

phew, thank you for this info. for a minute there i was about to once again experience secondhand embarrassment for the chinese government coming off as being "overly restrictive."

[info]idarklight

2009-11-28 06:30 am UTC

Aww, you should never feel embarrassed for what someone else did. And to be honest, the media department of the PRC is one of its least effective. For one, I love the PRC's proactive stances on environmentalism.

I think it's a bit sad that outside meeting always reports Chinese quotas as something wrong when in fact, every country has them. The US only recently had a quota on Chinese tire parts, and half of it seems to be clamoring over the idea of "buy American;" most kpop fans know how HanGeng had to wear a mask to perform because he was a foreigner; and Taiwan puts ridiculous amounts of restrictions on mainland visitors/immigrants.

[info]cfensi

2009-11-28 12:41 pm UTC

With regards to the Taiwan vs China relationship, mainland China has always been the one receiving the short end of the stick. This is why Chinese celebrities could never get famous in Taiwan before. Because of all the rules and regulations where they could not promote. They couldn't even talk to the media.

Any mainland women who married into Taiwanese families were also heavily restricted and always dependent on their husband because they had little rights. If they suffered spousal abuse, they could only take it, because so much of their rights depended on their husband.

Taiwan also strictly controls the number of permanent residency permits - required for a Taiwan identity card - issued to mainland spouses to 6,000 per year. No such quotas are placed on spouses from other countries. Mainlanders also do not qualify for an identity card card until after they have lived here for eight years, whereas foreign spouses are eligible for a card and citizenship after three years.

As a result, more foreign spouses - 59,906 by the end of November, mostly from Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand - have been granted citizenship than mainland spouses, only 44,493 of whom have identity cards, even though there are almost twice as many mainland spouses here than foreign spouses.

Without an ID card, the mainland spouses cannot vote. It is impossible to open a checking account, register a business under their name, get a home loan, obtain a passport or even make a wire transfer at major banks.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/JB15Ad01.html

There's crappy regulations in every country, but it's just that in the western media, only the mainland Chinese regulations get magnified and reported on. And in some cases like this, the news is made up, with "rumors" backed by little logic. idarklight came here, and commented, but what if she didn't? There's probably people who won't click below the cut, who will only read this news and feel the second-hand embarrassment.

Thus, Chinese Americans shouldn't embarrassed from such news. Take it all with a grain of salt. There's been lots of progress made in China, progress that gets reported on more and more, but still mostly glossed over.

[info]idarklight

2009-11-28 12:42 am UTC

I thought it might be useful to direct everyone to the Epoch Times wikipedia page, which is fairly well-documented and has credible sources (unlike the Epoch Times articles).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Epoch_Times#Reporting_style

My favorite part:
In 2008, The Epoch Times released articles claiming that the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake were caused by nuclear explosions detonated by the Chinese military.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

[info]v4ever

2009-11-28 02:06 am UTC

My god I hate that newspaper!
They always give it out for free where I live, and I always get so frustrated when I read the news in there (of course, I stopped reading). They are not concerned with journalism ethics at all, and so many of their reports are skewed and not based on facts. They are just so focused on screwing the Chinese government over to be concerned with anything else.

[info]blabby_lwy

2009-11-28 06:37 pm UTC

In 2008, The Epoch Times released articles claiming that the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake were caused by nuclear explosions detonated by the Chinese military

LOL
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…